1
سیاسی و روابط بین الملل::
پیشرفتگرای فراملی
Transnational progressives dominate major international and transnational institutions, including the leadership of the United Nations, the European Union, the European Court of Human Rights, the International Court of Justice, international non-governmental organizations (e.g.
My colleague, Walter Russell Mead, has labeled the globalists the "Davoisie,"70 while National Security Advisor John Bolton has referred to them as the "High Minded."71 In any case, it is clear to most American conservatives today (and it will be even clearer in the future) that the worldview advocated by transnational progressives is diametrically opposed to the interests and principles of those who want to "conserve" America's constitutional democracy and way of life.
Future political conflict between American conservatives and transnational progressives is inevitable.
Obama's U.N. speech and the writings of Slaughter and Koh are worth remembering because they are prototypes of the transnational progressive arguments that conservative foreign policy specialists will encounter more and more in the future.
Given what they perceive as the "limitations" of democratic sovereignty, these transnational progressive theorists posit that the legitimacy of global governance institutions comes from the knowledge and expertise of what they call "external epistemic communities" and "external epistemic actors" - presumable experts on international law, human rights, the environment, gender equity, and the like.
واژگان شبکه مترجمین ایران